sábado, 3 de septiembre de 2011

La atribución mayor nunca representar gráficamente

Instrucciones detalladas para la segmentación de costumbre sin marca
en la sección de Embudos de GA nuevo Multi canal

Atribución de multi canal es sorprendente, por lo menos. En las inmortales palabras de Avinash Kaushik, "Tendrá un orgasmo!" Si usted no estaban allí para Mozcon, lo siento. No permita que vuelva a ocurrir, pero siempre puede obtener el vídeo de su presentación a la hora de.

Mucho como lo sentí el día de Navidad de 1996, no podía esperar a jugar con un novedoso sistema cuyo funcionamiento interno sabía casi nada sobre: la Nintendo 64. Rand corroboran mi historia. Hoy, es los nuevos segmentaciones Multi canal Embudos en Google Analytics, versión 5 (por favor, trompetas Avinash).

A continuación, encontrará algunas imágenes de Miguel Ángel-esque de cómo nosotros (los chicos de R&D Slingshot) rompieron algunos segmentación personalizado y comparado a mostrar las diferencias entre:

No marca, orgánica, primeras interactionAll interactionsAll orgánicos sin marca conversiones

Para crear un segmento de conversión personalizada, simplemente pulse el enlace, como se muestra en esta captura de pantalla:

Para crear la primera interacción orgánica, Non-Branded segmento, seleccione lo siguiente:

[Primera interacción] [Media] [con] [orgánica] se incluyen a continuación, seleccione [agregar una opción de conversión de ruta]

Y por el amor de todos que es Mozzy, vaya a la sección "y" para agregar esta pieza. Uso "o" y no conoces al norte de oso o de dáctilo.

Excluir [cualquier interacción] [palabra clave] [Matching RegExp] [relleno en sus términos con marca aquí]

¿Hecho? Impresionante. Siguiente.

Para crear el todo orgánico, segmento no marca, seleccione lo siguiente:

[Cualquier interacción] [Media] [con] [orgánica] se incluyen a continuación, utilice "Agregar" no la "o" opción [agregar una opción de conversión de ruta]

Excluir [cualquier interacción] [palabra clave] [Matching RegExp] [relleno en sus términos con marca aquí]

¿Hecho? Eres el mejor. Ahora agarrar los palillos, comer algunos Cheetos y disfrutar de la gráfica!

El gráfico de delicious…, quiero decir. ¿Si en algún momento decide que está cansado de mirar todas las conversiones (lo que está mal con usted? Oh derecho, eres un Mozzer), puede elegir y seleccionar las conversiones específicas que le gustaría ver.

Captura de pantalla gratuito para su disfrute.


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

viernes, 2 de septiembre de 2011

6 Errores de investigación de palabras clave que podría hacer

Error al deserializar el cuerpo del mensaje de respuesta para la operación 'Translate'. Se superó la cuota de longitud del contenido de cadena (8192) al leer los datos XML. Esta cuota se puede aumentar cambiando la propiedad MaxStringContentLength en el objeto XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas que se usa para crear el lector XML. Línea 1, posición 9048.
Error al deserializar el cuerpo del mensaje de respuesta para la operación 'Translate'. Se superó la cuota de longitud del contenido de cadena (8192) al leer los datos XML. Esta cuota se puede aumentar cambiando la propiedad MaxStringContentLength en el objeto XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas que se usa para crear el lector XML. Línea 1, posición 9031.

Keyword research is an all too often under-appreciated aspect of SEO.

I've written a few keyword research posts here on SEOmoz and that's because I believe it to be the blueprint of any successful SEO campaign.

Here are some of the more common mistakes that I see people make with their keyword research.

#1 – You're being Unrealistic

"It is better to have a bigger slice of a few smaller pies rather than not getting even a slither of a much bigger pie."

Keyword research appears to be a very straightforward task. You fire up your keyword research tool of choice and find the keywords that relate to your industry with the highest search volumes. Sadly, that's not the way to do it if you want to see real results.

To many businesses, high-competition keywords are simply out of reach – at least in the short and medium term. Part of good keyword research is about being realistic and selecting appropriate keywords for targeting that take into account the site's age, current authority and any future optimisation that will take place.

Targeting one word keywords is quite often unrealistic but it may also prove unprofitable – someone searching for 'Toshiba l670 laptop' is likely to be much further along in the purchasing process that someone who searches for 'laptops' – think about which searcher is likely to have their credit card out already.

There's nothing wrong with targeting generic keywords, I'm simply saying that if your campaign has limited budget and you need results in the short to medium term then targeting less trafficked, less competitive keywords is a much better way to utilise resources.

Lower traffic but lower competition keywords might not seem as exciting to target but if your website can dominate these areas fairly quickly then you are going to see far more traffic from the search engines than failing to effectively target a much more competitive term.

#2 – You're looking at broad match instead of exact match

A seemingly simple mistake but one which many people continue to make...

Search volume is of course a very important metric when it comes to keyword research but all too often people make the mistake of looking at broad search volumes rather than the exact match figure when using tools like Google's Keyword Tool.

There can be a huge difference between broad match and exact match search traffic for example:

There are 135,000 broad match searches each month in the UK for 'dog kennels' but only 14,800 exact match searches for the same keyword. Still, this wouldn't prove particularly problematic as this is obviously still a keyword worth targeting – it would knock traffic and ROI projections way off kilter if you do these kinds of things though.

The real problem comes when you choose to target a keyword like 'ladies leather handbags' which has a broad match search volume of 2,400 but an exact match search volume of only 260 – failing to base your research on exact match data might mean you think you are targeting a reasonably well-trafficked keyword when in actual fact, once you've factored in data inaccuracies, you could be looking at a very low search volume keyword indeed.

It is widely accepted that Google's Keyword Tool isn't entirely accurate when it comes to search volumes but using exact match gives you the best data available when assessing how viable a keyword is to target.

#3 – You're targeting plural instead of singular

It is very common to see a website targeting the plural version of a keyword but in most cases, it is the singular version of a keyword that people are searching for.

I see this most often on eCommerce websites where the site owner optimises category pages and because they sell more than one product, they naturally focus on the pluralised keywords for example "tablet PCs" which actually gets 91% less searches than "tablet PC".

I will readily admit that Google is much better at determining that a singular and plural version of a keyword are one and the same, but in many cases there are still differences in the search results. Failing to target the singular keyword can be the difference between your search listing being highlighted in the SERPs (=higher clickthrough) and it can also mean your website appears lower (even slightly) than marginally better targeted pages – that could be the difference between making a sale and not.

#4 – You're ignoring conversion

This one could easily turn into a rant for me because so often I come up against clients who want to rank for [insert trophy keyword] when in actual fact they'd do better (financially) targeting a different keyword or set of keywords. I try to explain that a keyword that brings in traffic is wasted bandwidth if that traffic doesn't convert. You don't hire my company to get traffic for traffic's sake...you presumably hire us to help you ultimately make more sales.

The online world is competitive and it's only going to get more competitive, therefore making the most of every penny being invested is vital.

This makes conversion and language analysis a vital part of keyword research. The human mind is the only software capable of performing a good quality 'conversion audit' of a keyword list because whilst there are programmes out there that can filter and sort keywords to make your life easier, there's no real substitute for industry experience and SEO knowledge.

There are some very basic indicators for example prefixes such as 'buy' might be a clear indicator that the traffic from this keyword is going to convert.

A keyword conversion audit is more complex than that however since each situation and market is individual. I find existing data to be a very useful way to determine which keywords are likely to convert well. If you have goal tracking setup with Google Analytics, you can easily determine the highest converting keywords your site currently gets traffic from, try to identify patterns in your highest converting keywords and then translate and apply this knowledge to other areas of keyword research.

#5 – You're selecting keywords that are out of context

This is yet more rationale to further humanise the keyword research process because most keyword tools struggle to compute words and their meaning in the way a human would.

For example, a searcher looking for 'storage' could be looking for a self-storage centre, boxes and other storage furniture for the home or even professional storage solutions for a warehouse or office.

Opportunities for confused targeting are abundant which is why it is essential the keywords you decide to target are highly-relevant and laser-focused towards what your business offers.

A good way to do this is to search manually for the keywords in Google and see the kinds of results that come up, you will likely be able to get a feel for whether the keyword is applicable to the product or service you intended to target.

#6 – You're failing to conduct keyword reviews

It is accepted that SEO is an on-going process but rarely are target keywords reviewed and audited. If a marketplace is shifting over time then you would also expect customer search behaviour to develop and evolve over time too – this makes regular keyword reviews essential.

In most markets, I find an annual review is perfectly adequate. Any time period shorter than this and there is a risk that targeting becomes a bit chaotic with efforts focused on new keywords before results on old keywords have been achieved or evaluated.

That being said, in some competitive and very fast moving markets a more regular keyword review may be required.

The aim of a keyword review is to:

Weed out poor performing keywordsIdentify opportunities and areas for growthShape your SEO strategy for the future

To do a strategic and actionable keyword review you can use this adapted version of the Boston Matrix that I like to use.

Large brands use the Boston Matrix to assess the health of their product portfolio and to identify where to concentrate their resources.

You can do the same thing for your keyword portfolio.

Sort your keywords into four categories in order to better shape your search strategy for the future.

Question marks – these are keywords in areas where growth is likely but at present you're not getting the performance you'd expect. These are very often untapped keyword opportunities and you should plan how you are going to improve performance on these kinds of keywords.Stars – high-performance keywords and loads of room for growth – find ways to capitalise on growth. My advice is to focus your resources of gaining results in these areas for maximum ROI in a short period of time.Dogs – the poor performing keywords with little or no chance of growth – bin these in favour of other keywords, reallocate any resources to other areas.Cash cows – the high performing keywords that show little opportunity for growth – look for ways to enhance and maintain performance whilst identifying patterns and translating this learning to other areas or verticals.

What mistakes do you see happening in the keyword research process? Please share them in the comments section below...

By James Agate, founder of Skyrocket SEO and a regular SEO contributor to leading blogs and publications across the web.


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

La atribución mayor nunca representar gráficamente

Instrucciones detalladas para la segmentación de costumbre sin marca
en la sección de Embudos de GA nuevo Multi canal

Atribución de multi canal es sorprendente, por lo menos. En las inmortales palabras de Avinash Kaushik, "Tendrá un orgasmo!" Si usted no estaban allí para Mozcon, lo siento. No permita que vuelva a ocurrir, pero siempre puede obtener el vídeo de su presentación a la hora de.

Mucho como lo sentí el día de Navidad de 1996, no podía esperar a jugar con un novedoso sistema cuyo funcionamiento interno sabía casi nada sobre: la Nintendo 64. Rand corroboran mi historia. Hoy, es los nuevos segmentaciones Multi canal Embudos en Google Analytics, versión 5 (por favor, trompetas Avinash).

A continuación, encontrará algunas imágenes de Miguel Ángel-esque de cómo nosotros (los chicos de R&D Slingshot) rompieron algunos segmentación personalizado y comparado a mostrar las diferencias entre:

No marca, orgánica, primeras interactionAll interactionsAll orgánicos sin marca conversiones

Para crear un segmento de conversión personalizada, simplemente pulse el enlace, como se muestra en esta captura de pantalla:

Para crear la primera interacción orgánica, Non-Branded segmento, seleccione lo siguiente:

[Primera interacción] [Media] [con] [orgánica] se incluyen a continuación, seleccione [agregar una opción de conversión de ruta]

Y por el amor de todos que es Mozzy, vaya a la sección "y" para agregar esta pieza. Uso "o" y no conoces al norte de oso o de dáctilo.

Excluir [cualquier interacción] [palabra clave] [Matching RegExp] [relleno en sus términos con marca aquí]

¿Hecho? Impresionante. Siguiente.

Para crear el todo orgánico, segmento no marca, seleccione lo siguiente:

[Cualquier interacción] [Media] [con] [orgánica] se incluyen a continuación, utilice "Agregar" no la "o" opción [agregar una opción de conversión de ruta]

Excluir [cualquier interacción] [palabra clave] [Matching RegExp] [relleno en sus términos con marca aquí]

¿Hecho? Eres el mejor. Ahora agarrar los palillos, comer algunos Cheetos y disfrutar de la gráfica!

El gráfico de delicious…, quiero decir. ¿Si en algún momento decide que está cansado de mirar todas las conversiones (lo que está mal con usted? Oh derecho, eres un Mozzer), puede elegir y seleccionar las conversiones específicas que le gustaría ver.

Captura de pantalla gratuito para su disfrute.


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

eCommerce colegiados contenido: cómo ganar

Puestos del autor son completamente su propia (excepto en el caso improbable de hipnosis) y no siempre pueden reflejar las opiniones de SEOmoz, Inc.

Hay un montón de hablar ahora sobre recuperación de Panda. SEOmoz no es una excepción a esto: preguntas en Q&A, webmasters limpiando su contenido y mucho más. Webmasters están tomando el control de sus sitios, construir impresionante contenido original y garantizar que se encuentra contenido, permitiendo que los usuarios (y los robots) saben sobre él.

Así que me sorprendió cuando un cliente pidió ayuda luchar contra un proyecto interno que pudiera poner contenido duplicado en su sitio. Están en el espacio de comercio electrónico y la cuestión de la venta de productos que muchas otras compañías venden. Contenido duplicado ejecuta rampante en la forma de descripciones de productos. El fabricante crea una descripción para revendedores y eso es lo que todo el mundo usa. Es sancionado desde el origen y no escritores son necesarios. Sonidos impresionantes hasta que el producto es llevado por cientos de sitios Web y todo el mundo tiene el mismo contenido. ¿Quien debe clasificar entonces?

Como la mayoría de las grandes empresas (como es mi cliente), esta decisión fue tomada por otra persona y el equipo SEO gritó en defiance. Por lo que me pidieron que la prueba tengan contenido único fue tan necesaria como todo el mundo sigue diciendo.

Hecho. ¿Y adivinen qué? Google copia me (en al menos 3 ejemplos). Así que pensé que comparto mi mejor ejemplo y Mis regalos de tomar para ayudar a otros sitios de comercio electrónico frente a esta situación ahora y en el futuro.

Bodum Fyrkat Nipper

No hay ninguna renuncia necesaria en este caso, elegí este producto en total aleatorio de Amazon. Había comprado recientemente una parrilla personal del mismo fabricante y sabía que había muchos vendedores para ese producto. Quería algo que era lugar fresco pero también común. Por lo tanto, utiliza las pinzas de parrilla y fui buscando ejemplos de otros vendedores. Mi punto aquí es mostrar que contenido duplicado en forma de descripciones de producto no ayuda a rango de página del producto, por lo que fue el primer paso para encontrar varios vendedores del producto.

Para identificar a los vendedores, usé busca el nombre del producto, número de producto, un fragmento de la descripción del producto al vendedor (y una vez identificados, el fabricante suministra descripción) y algunos comentarios que mantuvieron apareciendo hasta. Me di cuenta de que muchas de las páginas que la descripción del producto estándar tenían las mismas dos revisiones así. Método sencillo para identificar una página sin contenido único. Las páginas de producto identificado (comprobación de la URL canónica), a continuación, se verificaron por página y dominio de la autoridad.

Cuando se comprueban las páginas, podrá ver una tendencia en las descripciones y ser capaz de identificar la fuente del fabricante para la descripción. Nota los sitios que escriben sus propios y que utilice el mismo como todos los demás. A continuación se presenta una lista de nuestros competidores y su dominio (DA) y la autoridad (PA) de la página, en orden de fuerza, agrupado por tipo de contenido. De esto, sería asumir fuerza basándose en Amazon, Zappos, Cooking.com o Epicurious tendría un fuerte disparo en el ranking.

Contenido original

Amazon.com: 97 DA, 1 PAZappos: 90 DA, PABodum 46-62 DA, emporios de ejecución PAMaple 35-18 DA 20 PA

Contenido duplicado

Epicurious – 89 DA, 1 PACooking.com: 78 DA, 42 PABetty Crocker-72 DA, 1 PACSNStore.com: 70 DA, 1 PAFood red tiendas – 64 DA, 1 PABuzzillions: 61 DA, 1 PA

¿Pero lo que estamos ranking? Normalmente utilizo una variación del nombre del producto, pero Amazon me lanzó una bola curva: renombraron el producto para ayudar con la búsqueda interna. En lugar de Fyrkat Grill Nipper, que utilizan el nombre Fyrkat Grill pinzas. Esta decisión tiene más sentido para mí, y supongo que ayuda a buscar internamente así. Pero no quería tome palabra de Amazon. Compruebe siempre que término es mejor según búsquedas reales.

Para probar, miré la herramienta de dificultad de palabras clave de SEOmoz y corrió tres palabras clave. Ninguno de ellos tuvo números de tráfico de Google, pero la dificultad de Fyrkat Grill Nipper fue superior. Tenía sentido como sitios más utilizan ese nombre para el producto, por lo que la competencia es más feroz. El impacto que esto tiene es que la página Amazon es probablemente va a mostrar más bajos de lo normal debido a el nombre del producto diferente.

Trabajo en la herramienta de dificultad de la palabra clave también darle un vistazo a los clasificación de los sitios para la palabra clave, que es el próximo paso.

Results

Los tres primeros resultados son Zappos, Bodum y ejecutar emporio de arce; el resto son vídeos o agregadores. Estos tres son los sitios con contenido original, sacar Amazonas debido a su orientación desplazado. El fabricante del producto es la tercero y mi teoría es que es debido al hecho de que su contenido se duplica a través de Internet, pero son original y debe estar ahí arriba.

Todas las demás marcas principales y sus páginas de producto no mostrar en la primera página, con CSN, siendo la única para mostrar en la segunda página. Motores de búsqueda que desee mostrar a los usuarios el mejor contenido para su tiempo, así que tiene sentido que agregadores (que muestran donde se vende el producto a través de la web) y contenido de vídeo es mezclados con los vendedores que tuvieron tiempo para describir el producto por su cuenta.

Lo que quiero que alejar de este post es esto: incluso un pequeño poco original de contenido puede establecer la página aparte de competidores.

Arce ejecutar Emporium, retirar su fuerza de dominio y la página. Son escasos junto a los más grandes sitios como Betty Crocker y Epicurious. Aún con una mano pequeña descripción del producto que es una frase escrita, ellos son ranking sobre todo los otros principales vendedores! Su página, a continuación, es simple y directo.

Fyrkat Grill Nipper

Siéntase libre de utilizar contenido sindicado para mejorar su propio contenido y revisiones. Hacen saber que es del fabricante.Colóquelo al final del texto de la página.Escribir sus propias descripciones de los productos. No estemos hablando de una novela, sino algo único.  Dar el producto a alguien en la Oficina y tenerlos a escribir lo que piensan.Utilizar las palabras de revisión del cliente (pedirles si son frescos con que a través de correo electrónico).No sólo reescribir el contenido que se le da al fabricante, realmente escribir lo que piensa sobre el producto.Divertirse con él. Ver ejemplos en Amazonas y Zappos.  Entice usuarios que revisen sus productos.Email una semana después de recibir el producto y darles un vínculo a la página del producto con una solicitud para revisarlo. Vea el ejemplo de Modcloth a continuación:

View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

9 Consejos útiles para la prospección de enlace

Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request

I find link prospecting to be one of the most time-consuming and challenging parts of link building. In order to build and maintain a natural link profile for your website, your prospecting activity needs to cover a wide range of opportunities and generate the right targets and leads for your project/campaign. So prospecting is usually pretty easy to start off with - run a few Google searches and you've got yourself a set of content-rich websites within your target industry. However, once you’ve gone through this initial list, you realise the challenge that you're faced with.

Here are some of the things we do at GPMD to generate a broader set of quality prospects. Using these practices, we're able to identify a huge selection of relevant, high quality blogs and industry websites within different sectors.

Tip 1: Advanced search queries

Advanced search queries are our starting point. They’re quick, easy to use and they are great for finding opportunities for guest blogging, collaboration projects, sponsorship etc.

Examples of advanced search queries:

Inurl Search (Dental inurl:blog / Dental blog inurl:.co.uk)

These search queries will filter websites with your preferred domain extension or search term within its URL. The above examples will return dental blogs and dental blogs based in the UK.

Exact Phrase Search (Dental “Guest post” / Dental “Write for us”)

These queries (using speech marks to find the exact text) are ideal for finding websites that are either looking for guest bloggers or accept guest blog posts. The above examples will return dental websites that accept guest posts and dental websites that are looking for writers.

Intitle Search (Dental Intitle:Guest Post – Dental Intitle: Advertise)

Searching for specific content within the title helps to filter the pages that are most relevant and also find opportunities by searching for advertising or guest posting opportunities. The above examples will return dental websites that accept guest posts and dental websites with advertising opportunities.

Wildcard Search (Dental “Guest *” blog)

Using the wildcard (*) filters results that contain the exact words within your query and an additional word in the position of the wildcard. The above query will return dental blogs that feature “guest post”, “guest writer”, “guest blog” etc within their content or title (with the second word in place of the wildcard).

Using more than one of these strings within the same search will help to further refine the results and provide very specific prospects for you to use to build links.

Example Query
Example of a query that could be used for finding guest blogging opportunities for a dental website.

Tip 2: Use Twitter tools to find niche bloggers

Building relationships on Twitter is a great way of generating opportunities. By regularly talking to bloggers within your industry, you’re developing an outreach that could be utilised for product launches, obtaining reviews, guest blogging and much more.

Follower Wonk:

Follower Wonk is a great tool that allows you to search through Twitter bios, helping you to identify targets for building relationships or just approaching for link-building.

Follower Wonk

Example: If you're looking to obtain links from dental blogs, you could search for dental blog, dentist blog, dentistry blog and so on. You can then filter the results and order by the available metrics to help find the most suitable people.

Topsy:

Topsy is a very useful tool that lets you search the social web (including blogs). You could search for your brand, niche keyword or web address, find the people who're talking about you or your industry and then get in touch (and hopefully get a link from their blog). You could also search for guest blogging opportunities using things like 'guest blog dentistry' and then approach the website owner/blogger.

These are just a couple of examples, there are literally thousands more tools that can help you find link building opportunities.


Topsy

Tip 3: Look at blogroll and directory links

BlogrollWhen you find a really good blog that you would like a link from, don't just contact them and wait for a reply! You should be looking for a links page or a blogroll to find other similar bloggers that could also provide a good link to your website. It is important to remember that not all good blogs are optimised for search, making a lot of them really hard to find – unless you use these kinds of techniques.

Also, when you're looking down at your competitors' links from directories like spammylinkdirectory.com (not a real website), you could be finding a few new opportunities. Chances are that you've already looked through your competitors' links, but you might find different websites that you haven't analysed within these directories, some of which may have some good ideas/links that you could emulate for your website.


Tip 4: Reverse image search

I often hear people moaning about how some blog or website has used one of their images in a post or article – without realising that this is a great opportunity to obtain a really good link! If you come across another website using your image, send them a polite email, compliment their content and website, and just ask if they can add a link to your website as the source of the image. This link-building technique is natural and free – which is why optimising your images and making them freely available is a great way of generating these opportunities. You can search for your web address in Google's new-look image search feature or tineye.com, both will help you to find where your images are being used.

TinEye Reverse Image Search

Tip 5: Use PPC advertising to find advertising opportunities

Running a short-term, low cost PPC campaign is a great way to find link building opportunities. Once your PPC ad is live on lots of related blogs, you can contact the blogger, mention your advert and suggest that you look at other options.

I would recommend complimenting the blog content and asking to submit a few guest posts about your experience within your industry. Then, once you have obtained a number of links, simply turn off the adwords campaign.

Tip 6: Use BuzzStream

I started using BuzzStream (a link-building CRM tool) around three months ago, with the intention of streamlining my link building process, and it has saved me a huge amount of time! BuzzStream does actually have a feature designed to identify link prospects, but I haven't really used it, I am more interested in the BuzzMarker and the BuzzBox.

The BuzzMarker is placed on your bookmark toolbar and it pulls in a huge amount of data with one simple click. This data includes whois information, social media accounts, contact details and even data from key SEO metrics (including SEOmoz data). All of this is then available within the CRM system itself and can be added too or edited at any point.

You can also BCC the BuzzBox email address into emails that you're sending to prospects, which will then automatically add the emails into the CRM.

BuzzStream CRM

Tip 7: Ask questions

Once you have built a relationship (or link) with a blogger or industry professional, why don't you ask them which blogs and news websites they follow? This is a great way of identifying websites that you may not have reached or found otherwise and it will take very little time. If the blogger is a friend of connection of the person who recommended it, you then also have an angle to start contact with.

Tip 8: Use what's already out there

Competitor Analysis:

Looking at the links that your competitors have will provide opportunities and inspiration, but there is a limit to the number of links that you can get. Once you have found new opportunities from your competitors, why don't you look at their links, and then links going to their links and so on? If you're looking at relevant websites, chances are they will have some good links that you can look to emulate.

Old linkbait:

If you're looking to implement an idea or even just get some quick links, looking at what has been done before is a really good place to start.

For example, if you're looking to write a list of the top 50 most influential bloggers in your industry, have a look at those who are featured on the list and check if they link back to the website. If they do link back, they could be an easy win. Also, as your version will be the latest one, it's probably worth contacting the people linking to the previous version and asking them to link to your new release.

Tip 9: Utilise existing relationships

If you're involved within your industry, chances are that you know people that have contacts that have blogs. Well, now is the time to pull in that favour and get the introduction.

If you know people, or know people that know people, make sure you take advantage of the situation, as I can guarantee that your competitors will be doing it.

These links are simple, natural and are difficult for competitors to copy.


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

eCommerce colegiados contenido: cómo ganar

Puestos del autor son completamente su propia (excepto en el caso improbable de hipnosis) y no siempre pueden reflejar las opiniones de SEOmoz, Inc.

Hay un montón de hablar ahora sobre recuperación de Panda. SEOmoz no es una excepción a esto: preguntas en Q&A, webmasters limpiando su contenido y mucho más. Webmasters están tomando el control de sus sitios, construir impresionante contenido original y garantizar que se encuentra contenido, permitiendo que los usuarios (y los robots) saben sobre él.

Así que me sorprendió cuando un cliente pidió ayuda luchar contra un proyecto interno que pudiera poner contenido duplicado en su sitio. Están en el espacio de comercio electrónico y la cuestión de la venta de productos que muchas otras compañías venden. Contenido duplicado ejecuta rampante en la forma de descripciones de productos. El fabricante crea una descripción para revendedores y eso es lo que todo el mundo usa. Es sancionado desde el origen y no escritores son necesarios. Sonidos impresionantes hasta que el producto es llevado por cientos de sitios Web y todo el mundo tiene el mismo contenido. ¿Quien debe clasificar entonces?

Como la mayoría de las grandes empresas (como es mi cliente), esta decisión fue tomada por otra persona y el equipo SEO gritó en defiance. Por lo que me pidieron que la prueba tengan contenido único fue tan necesaria como todo el mundo sigue diciendo.

Hecho. ¿Y adivinen qué? Google copia me (en al menos 3 ejemplos). Así que pensé que comparto mi mejor ejemplo y Mis regalos de tomar para ayudar a otros sitios de comercio electrónico frente a esta situación ahora y en el futuro.

Bodum Fyrkat Nipper

No hay ninguna renuncia necesaria en este caso, elegí este producto en total aleatorio de Amazon. Había comprado recientemente una parrilla personal del mismo fabricante y sabía que había muchos vendedores para ese producto. Quería algo que era lugar fresco pero también común. Por lo tanto, utiliza las pinzas de parrilla y fui buscando ejemplos de otros vendedores. Mi punto aquí es mostrar que contenido duplicado en forma de descripciones de producto no ayuda a rango de página del producto, por lo que fue el primer paso para encontrar varios vendedores del producto.

Para identificar a los vendedores, usé busca el nombre del producto, número de producto, un fragmento de la descripción del producto al vendedor (y una vez identificados, el fabricante suministra descripción) y algunos comentarios que mantuvieron apareciendo hasta. Me di cuenta de que muchas de las páginas que la descripción del producto estándar tenían las mismas dos revisiones así. Método sencillo para identificar una página sin contenido único. Las páginas de producto identificado (comprobación de la URL canónica), a continuación, se verificaron por página y dominio de la autoridad.

Cuando se comprueban las páginas, podrá ver una tendencia en las descripciones y ser capaz de identificar la fuente del fabricante para la descripción. Nota los sitios que escriben sus propios y que utilice el mismo como todos los demás. A continuación se presenta una lista de nuestros competidores y su dominio (DA) y la autoridad (PA) de la página, en orden de fuerza, agrupado por tipo de contenido. De esto, sería asumir fuerza basándose en Amazon, Zappos, Cooking.com o Epicurious tendría un fuerte disparo en el ranking.

Contenido original

Amazon.com: 97 DA, 1 PAZappos: 90 DA, PABodum 46-62 DA, emporios de ejecución PAMaple 35-18 DA 20 PA

Contenido duplicado

Epicurious – 89 DA, 1 PACooking.com: 78 DA, 42 PABetty Crocker-72 DA, 1 PACSNStore.com: 70 DA, 1 PAFood red tiendas – 64 DA, 1 PABuzzillions: 61 DA, 1 PA

¿Pero lo que estamos ranking? Normalmente utilizo una variación del nombre del producto, pero Amazon me lanzó una bola curva: renombraron el producto para ayudar con la búsqueda interna. En lugar de Fyrkat Grill Nipper, que utilizan el nombre Fyrkat Grill pinzas. Esta decisión tiene más sentido para mí, y supongo que ayuda a buscar internamente así. Pero no quería tome palabra de Amazon. Compruebe siempre que término es mejor según búsquedas reales.

Para probar, miré la herramienta de dificultad de palabras clave de SEOmoz y corrió tres palabras clave. Ninguno de ellos tuvo números de tráfico de Google, pero la dificultad de Fyrkat Grill Nipper fue superior. Tenía sentido como sitios más utilizan ese nombre para el producto, por lo que la competencia es más feroz. El impacto que esto tiene es que la página Amazon es probablemente va a mostrar más bajos de lo normal debido a el nombre del producto diferente.

Trabajo en la herramienta de dificultad de la palabra clave también darle un vistazo a los clasificación de los sitios para la palabra clave, que es el próximo paso.

Results

Los tres primeros resultados son Zappos, Bodum y ejecutar emporio de arce; el resto son vídeos o agregadores. Estos tres son los sitios con contenido original, sacar Amazonas debido a su orientación desplazado. El fabricante del producto es la tercero y mi teoría es que es debido al hecho de que su contenido se duplica a través de Internet, pero son original y debe estar ahí arriba.

Todas las demás marcas principales y sus páginas de producto no mostrar en la primera página, con CSN, siendo la única para mostrar en la segunda página. Motores de búsqueda que desee mostrar a los usuarios el mejor contenido para su tiempo, así que tiene sentido que agregadores (que muestran donde se vende el producto a través de la web) y contenido de vídeo es mezclados con los vendedores que tuvieron tiempo para describir el producto por su cuenta.

Lo que quiero que alejar de este post es esto: incluso un pequeño poco original de contenido puede establecer la página aparte de competidores.

Arce ejecutar Emporium, retirar su fuerza de dominio y la página. Son escasos junto a los más grandes sitios como Betty Crocker y Epicurious. Aún con una mano pequeña descripción del producto que es una frase escrita, ellos son ranking sobre todo los otros principales vendedores! Su página, a continuación, es simple y directo.

Fyrkat Grill Nipper

Siéntase libre de utilizar contenido sindicado para mejorar su propio contenido y revisiones. Hacen saber que es del fabricante.Colóquelo al final del texto de la página.Escribir sus propias descripciones de los productos. No estemos hablando de una novela, sino algo único.  Dar el producto a alguien en la Oficina y tenerlos a escribir lo que piensan.Utilizar las palabras de revisión del cliente (pedirles si son frescos con que a través de correo electrónico).No sólo reescribir el contenido que se le da al fabricante, realmente escribir lo que piensa sobre el producto.Divertirse con él. Ver ejemplos en Amazonas y Zappos.  Entice usuarios que revisen sus productos.Email una semana después de recibir el producto y darles un vínculo a la página del producto con una solicitud para revisarlo. Vea el ejemplo de Modcloth a continuación:

View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

jueves, 1 de septiembre de 2011

Guía de un SEO RegEx

Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
The author's posts are entirely his or her own (excluding the unlikely event of hypnosis) and may not always reflect the views of SEOmoz, Inc. RegEx is not necessarily as complicated as it first seems. What looks like an assorted mess of random characters can be over facing, but in reality it only takes a little reading to be able to use some basic Regular Expressions in your day to day work.For example, you could be using the filter box at the bottom of your Google Analytics keyword report to find keywords containing your brand, such as Distilled. If you want to include both capitalised and non-capitalised versions, you could use the Regular Expression [Dd]istilled. Pretty simple, right?Hang on though… some of you might be asking, what the hell is RegEx? That’s a good point. RegEx (short for Regular Expressions) is a means of matching strings (essentially pieces of text). You create an expression which is a combination of characters and metacharacters and a string will be matched against it.So in the example of the keyword report above, your Regular Expression is applied to each keyword and if it matches it’s included in the report. If it doesn’t match, it’s discarded.RegEx has many uses aside from Google Analytics too such as form validation or URL rewrite rules.  Hopefully this post will give you an understanding of the basics and some ideas for where you might be able to use it.I mentioned that Regular Expressions are made up of characters and metacharacters. A character, to clarify, is any letter, number, symbol, punctuation mark, or space. In RegEx, their meaning is literal – the letter A matches the letter A, the number 32 matches 32, and distilled matches distilled (but not Distilled - characters in RegEx are case sensitive).Metacharacters, however, are not treated literally. Below I’ll go through each of the metacharacters used in RegEx and explain their special meanings.If you want to test them out as we go along, I’d recommend opening up Google Analytics and using the filter box at the bottom of your reports. Alternatively you could use http://RegExpal.com/ and make up your own data set.A dot matches any single character. That is to say, any single letter, number, symbol or space. For example, the Regular Expression .ead matches the strings read, bead, xead, 3ead, and !ead amongst many others. It’s worth noting that ead would not be matched as the . requires that a character is present.From time to time you’ll find that a character that you want to match is a metacharacter.  For example, if you’re trying to match an IP address such as 172.16.254.1, you will find that your RegEx matches 172.16.254.1 but also any string such as 1721161254.1 because the dots can represent any character.Preceding a metacharacter with a backslash indicates that it should be treated as a character and taken literally.  In the example above, you should use 172\.16\.254\.1The question mark is often found in dynamic URLs such as /category.php?catid=23.  If you’re trying to track this page as part of your conversion funnel, you may experience problems as question marks, as we’ll see later, are metacharacters.  The solution is simple: /category.php\?catid=23Square brackets can be used to define a set of characters – any one of the characters within the brackets can be matched.  We saw them in the example I used in the introduction - [Dd]istilled can be used to match both distilled and Distilled.  You can also use a range, defined with a hyphen.  [0-9] matches any single number for example, or [a-z] matches any lower case letter of the alphabet.  It’s also possible to combine ranges, such as [A-Fa-f] would match any letter between a and f in either lower or upper case.  Ranges are often combined with repetition which we’ll touch on next.Specifically in character sets, you can use the caret ^ to negate matches.  For example [^0-9] matches anything but the characters in the range.The question mark, plus symbol, asterisk, and braces all allow you to specify how many times the previous character or metacharacter ought to occur.The question mark is used to denote that either zero or one of the previous character should be matched.  This means that an expression such as abc? would match both ab and abc, but not abcd or abcc etc.The plus symbol shows that either one or more of the previous character is to be matched.  For example, abc+ would match abc, abcc, and anything like abccccccc.  It would not, however, match ab as the character has to be present.The asterisk is an amalgamation of the two – it matches either zero, one or more of the preceding character.  An example you say?  Oh go on then!  abc* matches ab, abc, abcc, and anything beyond that such as abccccccc.Finally, braces can be used to define a specific number or range of repetitions.  [0-9]{2} would match any 2 digit number for example, and [a-z]{4,6} would match and combination of lower case letters between 4 and 6 characters long.Parentheses allow you to group characters together.  I may, for example, want to filter the keyword report for searches containing my name, and I want to pick up both rob millard and robert millard.  I could do this by using rob(ert)? millard – the question mark and parentheses mean that either zero or one of ert can be matched.In addition, you can use the pipe to represent OR.  You might use it for something like (SEO|seo|s\.e\.o\.|S\.E\.O\.)moz to track SEOmoz, seomoz, s.e.o.moz, and S.E.O.moz, although the versions with dots seem unlikely.The pipe can also be used without the parentheses if you don’t need to group the characters.  For example iphone|ipad could be used to filter traffic coming to your site from keywords containing either.Although we’ve already looked at the caret in conjunction with square brackets, it can also be used to show that a string must start with the following characters.  For example, if you’re trying to match all URLs within a specific directory of your site, you could use ^products/.  This would match things like products/item1 and products/item2/description but not a URL that doesn’t start with that string, such as support/products/.The dollar sign means the string must end with these characters.  Again you could use it to track certain URLs like /checkout$ which would pick up the likes of widgets/cart/checkout and gadgets/cart/checkout but not checkout/help.There are a few quick timesavers here…\d means match any number i.e. the same as [0-9]\w means match any letter in either case, number, or underscore i.e. [A-Za-z0-9_]\s means match any whitespace, which includes spaces, tabs, and line breaks.Phew!  That’s quite a lot to digest.  I’d recommend playing around with the short examples above to really get a feel for them.  Once you’re comfortable with the basics you can start getting stuck into the real uses…Filters can be used to exclude internal traffic out of your reports, and combined with some simple RegEx you can filter a range of IP addresses.  In Profile Settings, create a new custom filter which excludes the filter field Visitor IP Address.  Using an expression such as 55\.65\.132\.2[678] would exclude IP addresses 55.65.132.26, 55.65.132.27, and 55.65.132.28.Another Google Analytics feature which can greatly benefit from the use of RegEx is Advanced Segments.  One of the more common uses is to create a segment for non-branded organic search traffic so that you get a clear picture of your SEO efforts, unaffected by any branding exercises.  Create a segment where the medium matches exactly organic and create an and statement where the keyword does not match Regular Expression.  In this statement, you should include RegEx such as the [Dd]istilled example in the introduction, or for my personal site it might look like [Rr]ob(ert)? [Mm]illard.You could also use Advanced Segments to create a social media segment - select source and set the condition to matches Regular Expression.  Your value should be something like facebook|twitter|youtube|digg etc.I’ve already touched on the filter box at the bottom of each report earlier in this post - it’s probably where I most often use RegEx as it can be a great help when investigating specific problems or queries.  Use the pipe, for example, in the keyword report to find keywords containing a few synonyms, or do something similar to the social media segment on the fly by listing a handful of sites in the traffic sources report.Finally, RegEx can be useful when setting up conversion goal pages and funnel steps where you want more than one URL as the goal or step.  When setting up a new goal with a URL destination, use the match type Regular Expression match.  You might wish to use a value such as ^/(widgets|gadgets)/checkout/thanks\.php$ to track both /widgets/checkout/thanks.php and /gadgets/checkout/thanks.php for example.  When setting up a funnel, all URLs are treated as Regular Expressions so you can use the same technique.There are more advanced examples for all of the uses above in several excellent blog posts and resources about RegEx and Google Analytics - there are too many to list here but I’d thoroughly recommend searching and reading some of them.I expect that most of you SEOmoz readers are familiar with SEO friendly URLs.  They should be static rather than dynamic and should be descriptive.  Often this is achieved using URL rewrites which are implemented on Apache servers using the built in module called mod_rewrite.  A text file called .htaccess sits at the root of the domain which contains your mod_rewrite rules.  A simple rewrite looks something like this:RewriteRule ^category/link-building/?$ category.php?cat=link-building [NC]This example would mean that the URL www.example.com/category/link-building/ would actually serve the page www.example.com/category.php?cat=link-building.  As you may remember from earlier, the caret and dollar sign mean that the URL must start and end with link-building/, and the question mark means that the trailing slash is optional.  [NC] is not RegEx - it is part of mod_rewrite’s syntax which simply states that the RewriteRule is not case sensitive.Obviously this approach is not particularly efficient for large sites with thousands of URLs, and this is where RegEx becomes indispensable as it allows you to match patterns.  A dynamic rewrite rule using RegEx might look like this:RewriteRule ^category/([A-Za-z0-9-]+)/?$ category.php?cat=$1 [NC]This rules states that the URL must start with category/ and can then be followed by any combination of letters, numbers and hyphens as long as there are one or more (+).  This part of the rule is surrounded with parentheses so that it can be referenced in the second part of the rule using $1.  If you had a subsequent set of parentheses, it could be referenced with $2 and so on.  Again, the trailing slash is optional because of the question mark, and the caret and dollar sign are used to define the start and end of the URL.This is just one simple example in an area where there are numerous possibilities.  If you want to know more I’d definitely recommend checking out this guide as well as the excellent cheat sheet.This is something I’ve only been getting to grips with lately, but turning on wildcards in Word’s Find and Replace can save a huge amount of time when cleaning and manipulating data.  I find that I’m often doing this when creating reports or preparing data for an infographic for example.You can find the wildcards check box under the advanced options in Find and Replace.  An example of how you might use it could be to remove the session ID from a list of URLs.  You could enter sid=[0-9]+ into the find box, and leave the replace box blank.As with mod_rewrite you can also reference back to your find box, although the syntax is slightly different.  Instead of $1 and $2 you use \1 and \2.  If you had a list of URLs and you wanted to switch the subdirectories round you could use example.com/([a-z-]+)/([a-z-]+)/$ in the find box and use example.com/\2/\1/ in the replace box.There’s more about using RegEx in Word on the Microsoft support site here and here. Of course there are many, many other uses for Regular Expressions, especially in programming, but I hope this gives you some idea of the potential of RegEx in the field of SEO.  Let me know if you have any questions or thoughts in the comments, or feel free to give me a shout on Twitter (@rob_millard).http://RegExpal.com/ - useful tool that mentioned in the main post which is great for testing your RegEx.

View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Contenido Marketing para el talento de deterioro

Error al deserializar el cuerpo del mensaje de respuesta para la operación 'Translate'. Se superó la cuota de longitud del contenido de cadena (8192) al leer los datos XML. Esta cuota se puede aumentar cambiando la propiedad MaxStringContentLength en el objeto XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas que se usa para crear el lector XML. Línea 2, posición 8354.
Error al deserializar el cuerpo del mensaje de respuesta para la operación 'Translate'. Se superó la cuota de longitud del contenido de cadena (8192) al leer los datos XML. Esta cuota se puede aumentar cambiando la propiedad MaxStringContentLength en el objeto XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas que se usa para crear el lector XML. Línea 1, posición 8846.
The author's posts are entirely his or her own (excluding the unlikely event of hypnosis) and may not always reflect the views of SEOmoz, Inc.

Minimalist Roger MozbotThere’s a reason people balk at content marketing – it’s hard. Not only do we have to be marketers, but now we’re supposed to be subject-matter experts, writers, and designers? Sure, we can hire it out, and sometimes we should, but there’s something to be said for crafting a piece of content entirely on your own. It’s not just ego – it’s your vision and only you really understand what you want in the finished product.

For me, the gap is often in the design and illustration. I’m assuming you’re a subject-matter expert in something and can write about it competently (it’s ok if you’re not a poet). If you’re like me, and your expectations are bigger than your talents, I’d like to offer a few shortcuts I’ve learned for designing your own content.

It’s amazing what you can do with a few words and a splash of color. For example, I started a recent post by writing out how much money Google made last year:

29 Billion Dollars

With just one font and strategic use of color, I was able to not only emphasize that $29B is a lot of money, but I tied it to Google’s identity. Best of all, it only took a few minutes.

I have to come clean and admit that I learned this trick (a couple of these tricks, actually) from Rand. Here’s another example, from his recent post on the responsibilities of a modern SEO:

SEO Responsibilities in 2011

The image looks great, and it really livened up Rand’s post, but what is it, really? It’s just well-placed text with a splash of color. I’m not picking on Rand – my point is that these small touches can make a huge difference.

Even if you go beyond text, you don’t have to be an artist to create a simple illustration that effectively communicates an idea. Justin Briggs had a great post here recently on how Google might detect spam, and it included images like this one:

Relative Mass of Links

Practically speaking, it’s just some circles and arrows, but these images really helped illustrate the complex ideas in Justin’s post. It wasn’t the complexity of the design that mattered, but the depth of the ideas behind the design.

Let’s pick on Rand again. Here’s an image he did for a recent post on inbound marketing:

Inbound Marketing Channels

I’ll let you in on a little secret – boxes and arrows are one of Rand’s favorite tricks. It’s hard to argue, because this image is a lot more compelling than a bulleted list. I hope you’re also seeing a pattern here – it’s the quality of the thought behind the image that really matters.

I admit that I’m trying to keep this post to mostly SEOmoz examples – not to pat ourselves on the back, but to show that we practice what I’m preaching. Here’s an outside example I really like, though, a Minimalist Muppet poster created by Eric Slager:

Obviously, this one is a bit more complex than my previous examples, but the actual design elements are pretty simple. The concept is genius, but the graphic itself really is minimalist. The minimalist meme has been going around – here’s another example with superhero posters (via ScreenRant.com):

My minimalist Roger Mozbot illustration should make a bit more sense now. The moral of this story: you can do a lot with some basic skills, if the core concept is strong enough. Clearly, this is the work of talented designers, but you don’t have to be an Adobe Illustrator guru to create something similar. You just have to start with great ideas.

It’s not stealing if you take your own stuff – good content creators learn when and how to re-use their own content. That doesn’t necessarily mean using the same image over and over (although there are times when even that can be very effective). It means learning how to re-use elements of your own illustrations, sometimes even within the same post. Recently, I did a post on marketing ethics, and I illustrated the post with whiteboard-style drawings like this one:

Marketing Ethics Illustration

It won’t hang in a museum anytime soon, but I think the series of illustrations helped simplify a difficult topic. If you look at the 5 illustrations, you’ll see each of them have some variation on the same 5 elements:

Faces, Arrow, Car Illustrations

You don’t have to be a connoisseur of the fine arts to realize that element #2 is just the same guy with a bowtie and element #5 is the blue car “painted” red. Take away the brick wall in the 1st image and the gray box, and I essentially created 5 illustrations with 3 main elements.

Last year, Rand did a great piece illustrating indexation issues. Some of the illustrations were pretty complex, like this one:

Diagram - PageRank Impacts Crawling

Before the days of Roger Mozbot (or, as we call it, the Time of Despair), Rand used to frequently create illustrations that were essentially Googlebot + Page icons + Arrows + Text. Again, I’m not picking on him – the finished products were great. Break them down, though (and pay attention over years of content), and you’ll see that Rand was re-using a lot of work he’d already done. That’s one of the reasons he can pound out an amazing blog post between 2-4am on a trans-Atlantic flight.

Re-use starts with being a curator of your own content. Eventually, you may even build some custom illustration libraries. Here’s an example – back in 2008, I wrote an e-book on CRO that started with an illustrated guide to conversion metrics. It included images like this one:

Web-page Templates

If you read my recent post on duplicate content and Panda, this may seem oddly familiar. That post used a number of similar web-page images, including:

Web Page Templates

In that post, I easily converted this basic template into 8 different illustrations. Condensed, those illustrations look something like this:

8 Examples of Web Page Templates

I don’t want to beat you to death with this point, but I think it’s often easy to miss how elements can build on each other. This kind of approach not only saves time, but it gives your content a consistent look and feel and can make your work look more professional.

You can also see how easy it would be to split these web-page templates into a basic library of layers (I actually have multiple Photoshop files, but the core concept is the same):

Web Page Template Layers

As you develop these design libraries over time, especially with an image as flexible as a basic web-page, you find more and more creative ways to use them. Best of all, the quality of your illustrations improves even as they take less time to create. You may even find yourself earning a reputation for your distinctive talent-impaired style.

Stop saying you’re “not a designer” and design something. It doesn’t have to be perfect, it just has to be based on a good idea. Over time, you’ll get better, even if you can only put in 10-15 minutes a day. If you find yourself staring at the computer screen for an hour, pick a new medium. A few months ago, I got up, walked to Office Depot, and bought a box of Crayola markers. It was one of the best creative decisions I’ve made in a long time. Whatever it takes, get started.


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Artículo Marketing: Principalmente una estafa - pizarra el viernes

Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request

Article marketing is mostly a scam. Well, wait... some types of article marketing are really scammy. Guest blogging, legitimate article sharing, and similar tactics are great and sustainable linkbuilding practices, but making up terrible article content and passing it off as something people should read or link to is both bad for users and bad for long-term SEO. This week, Rand discusses some of the reasons article marketing is so nefarious and some alternatives that are more user-friendly. Have any alternatives or tactics you're fond of? Let us know in the comments below!

Howdy SEOmoz fans! Welcome to another edition of Whiteboard Friday. This week we're talking about one of the scummiest, lowdownest, dirtiest, ugliest, messiest, nastiest, no goodnesst things of all in the SEO world, it is called article marketing.

Now, there are some good, authentic, legitimate forms of article marketing. They're usually called guest blogging or guest authorship, guest writing. What article marketing has come to mean in the field that we are in is something just sickeningly awful. So what I want to do today is talk about it a little bit. You can probably feel some of my pain. Then, we can get into it in the comments and talk more. I know one of the issues, too, is that some folks have success with this, especially early on in their careers, and then think, oh, this is how I can do SEO. I can just do article marketing.

Let me first, for those of you who aren't familiar, walk you through how article marketing or article spinning, article republishing is done. Basically, we have our friend here. I don't know, let's call him Fred. Fred is clacking away on his keyboard. He's like, "Oh, you know what? I am going to make a useless, fairly painful to read, crap article about why cats are the best pets, and in that article I am going to link back to pages on my site that are about cat ownership or cat food or whatever it is that I am trying to rank for. Those links are going to pass me some nice juice. They'll go over to my website. That'll be real nice there." But instead of just publishing on my site, I might publish it on my site, but I am also going to either take it with me and submit it to a bunch of article directories, article portals, article resource sites, sometimes they're called article publishers. They have all sorts of different names - article portals or something like that sometimes.

Or even better, I'm going to use the article spinning robot software that I downloaded which will go and submit it to all these different article sites for me. By the way, one of the great features of it is it bypasses the CAPTCHA by reading it or they have special arrangements and it only cost me $299. How can I go wrong? My god! It sounds like an amazing deal. Who wouldn't want to spin their article with Article Spinning Robot 5000 for $300? What a . . . sure, that's totally going to work.

So, once you get your article published up on all these different sites, the goal is, the idea is that hopefully when I search Google for why cats are the best pets, I see hundreds of different results. Oh, look at all these article sites that I submitted to, they're all getting indexed, and that must mean they're passing link juice back to me, and hey some of these article sites have a nice home page PageRank, maybe a 4 or a 5 or even 3. Super exciting. Clearly going to be incredibly valuable and useful for my SEO practices. So the goal is I am going to get these hundreds of sites that are all linking back to me with the anchor text that I have optimized from my article and that's going to help me rank.

You know what the problem is? The thing that sucks about this is that sometimes it works. In fact, sometimes it works for months at a time or even a year or two at a time.

I was just in New York. I was speaking at an affiliate conference event, and there were some people in the room. One of the people there asked me, she said, "You know, Rand, I do a lot of article marketing, and I am wondering, instead of writing unique content pieces, entirely unique, I heard that Google only duplicate content checks the first and the last paragraph. So can I just leave the middle paragraphs the same and produce hundreds of different articles, send them out to all the different sites? Because usually the editors, they don't even have editors or they are crappy. They don't review anything. So, if the first paragraph is unique, they usually accept the article and I can get them reposted. Do you think that will work well?"

I don't even know how to tell you what's wrong with your frame of mind when you ask these questions. It's incredibly frustrating. I tried to be very empathetic and explain, hey, search engines use these Markov chain analyses, they can detect duplicate content, very similar content pretty easily, and these sites tend to be very low quality anyway. She's sort of like, "Well, okay. I hear you, but I did get my rankings up quite a bit when I used the article spinner." It's sort of like, yeah, the problem with all of this stuff, with low quality tactics like this is that sometimes they work in the short term and you have to decide whether it is worth the risks.

Let's talk about a few of those. First off, does Google really want to count those links? Is that what search engineers feel like are going to provide the best results? When I search for something in Google and they say, "Ah, well, you know what, looks like Rand's article on white cats are the best pets, that's been spun on 300 article sites, so he must be the very best resource in the whole world on that topic." Can you possibly imagine a Googler thinking that way? So, instead they're going to be writing algorithms to try and prevent this stuff from working. They do all the time. Some of them fall out of favor. You can see they'll sometimes publicly lose their PageRank, or they won't but they'll lose their ability to pass link juice, or the sites will be completely penalized and they won't rank anywhere in the top 5 or 10 results and your site won't rank anywhere. One day Google just wakes up, does an algorithm change. You wake up in the morning, and boom, all your rankings are gone. You're way down in the penalty box. You go, "What did I do wrong? I've been a good article spinner. How could they do this to me?"

Another big risk is the duplicate content side. If you've submitting any content that you'd actually like to rank for, it's going to be pretty tough because some of these article sites are going to claim it's their own. They're going to earn links to their site more than you're able to earn links to your site. You might be penalized and they stay unpenalized, meaning that they're going to essentially cannibalize the traffic that you could have earned. If you are writing anything really good, you should be wanting to put it on one of two sites - your own 90% of the time, or maybe 10% of the time on a guest posting on another blog, on another website, on a content site, that has great reach, great reputation, that's going to earn you some trust and authority, not just from the links you're going to get. That's not the goal. The goal is to get readership and trust over to your site from real people who enjoy that content.

Of course, the content itself. Most of the time when people are talking about doing article marketing or article spinning, they're talking about the worst quality, lowest junk crap. As you can see with updates like Panda and Big Daddy and Vince a little bit, Google is just getting so much smarter about content analysis, and they're able to determine what matters in a block of text and what actual people like. They use user and usage data to do this now. Trying to game that system with low quality junk is not going to get you very far.

Finally, the thing that I think people forget about the most is they'll spend weeks or months, hours and hours on end, trying to spin the right things and find the right directories and getting their articles submitted here and generating some junky crap over there. I think to myself, imagine, imagine if you were doing something authentic. Imagine if you were doing real high quality SEO and inbound marketing. Imagine if instead of doing that, you got 50 more Twitter followers that day and you shared a bunch of good stuff and you wrote one guest post that maybe only went to one site, but that link lasted for the next 10 years. Imagine what you've lost when you spend time doing this kind of crap.

So, are there some alternatives? I was talking to some people at the affiliate show about the alternatives they are using. They're like, "Yeah, you know, when article marketing stopped working for me, I went with some directory link submission stuff. Then I tried some do follow commenting, and that seemed to work all right." They are sort of like, "Oh, you know, maybe some nofollow comments. That could work as well. It seems like sometimes nofollow comments do work. I'll do some reciprocal link exchanges." No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. Just no. Okay.

How about you try something, anything real? Real and useful. If you think that you can manipulate the search engines or that search engine optimization, that the practice of improving your rankings and gaining traffic is going to be done through this kind of stuff, you're living a decade ago man. This is not going to work. One of the worst parts about this is that when you do this, the impression you create on users, on visitors who do find you, even if you manage to win . . . let's imagine that you got your content up to number one using article spinning and article robots and article marketing. Good for you. Imagine what's going to happen when I come to your site, I visit, and I am, like, "God, this is totally junky." Then I see a bunch of nofollow comment spam that you've left on the Web, and I see the articles of low quality that you've submitted everywhere. What am I going to think about your brand? How is your conversion rate possibly going to match up to the high rankings that you've achieved? If it doesn't, why are you even bothering? Isn't it so much easier to get 100 visitors and convert 10 of them than to get 10,000 visitors and convert 1 out of 1,000? It always is.

So, I really want to suggest it's not that article marketing is evil. This isn't a moral thing. This is about wasting your time and energy as a marketer and doing things that just detract from our profession.

I hope that you will avoid the classic forms of article marketing and consider some real authentic alternatives. I certainly hope that you'll join me again next week for another edition of Whiteboard Friday. Take care.


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

¿Cómo informes personalizados de Google Analytics ayudó a mi cliente para aumentar sus ingresos

A menudo me pregunto cómo habría sido la vida de un consultor SEO si no hubo Google Analytics. Quiero decir, seguro que en ese caso un montón de herramientas pagados como Omniture, etc. Webtrends habría dominado el segmento de análisis del mundo online, pero entonces, ello también significa que los dueños de negocios del mundo habría tenido que bomba en los bucks extras en sus campañas de marketing en línea.

Google Analytics se ha convertido en parte integral de nuestro análisis de datos y todavía muy a menudo tenemos tierra hasta criticar algunas de sus defectos más pequeños. Pero en todo esto del amor y el odio de juego, siempre olvidamos la característica más importante de esta maravillosa herramienta, es decir, absolutamente gratis y hay un montón de características que no ofrecen un montón de otras herramientas de pagos.

En una nota personal, siempre he creído que informes personalizados, Variables personalizadas y Variables definidas por el usuario son algunas de las características más prolongadas de Google Analytics y muchas empresas de marketing de internet no utilizar estas características sorprendentes al máximo de sus posibilidades. De hecho, si se utiliza inteligentemente, Google Analytics más a menudo puede ayudarle salir de situaciones difíciles, especialmente cuando se trata con high-end y de alto perfil, clientes exigentes.

Imaginar a un cliente cuyo SEO, PPC y campañas en los medios sociales están haciendo realmente bien y aún viene a TI y afirma que quiere que su sitio Web para generar más ingresos. Teniendo esto en mente, he decidido analizar uno de los sitios Web de mi cliente desde el punto de vista de la usabilidad y como de costumbre me volví a Google Analytics para alguna ayuda.

Ahora antes de la palabra "usabilidad" despista te que quiero aclarar por usabilidad que me refería a comprender y analizar el rendimiento de mi sitio Web en distintos navegadores en términos de las mediciones proporcionadas por Google Analytics. He creado un simple informe personalizado con "Browser" como mi dimensión clave. La idea era encontrar lagunas en el sitio Web desde un punto de vista de explorador utilizando algunas de las mediciones clave de usuario como salida de tasa y % de rebote. Una vez los datos de las páginas de bajo rendimiento habría sido el siguiente paso identificar cualquier compatibilidad problemas como la página no carga correctamente o la resolución de pantalla incorrecto etc..

Antes que discutir las conclusiones del informe vamos a simplemente echar un vistazo a cómo ir sobre la elaboración de este informe.

Estamos generando un informe personalizado simple con algunas de las métricas claves básicas como ingresos, tasa de rebote, % salida y compras exclusivas. Y las dimensiones seleccionadas son navegador, la página y la palabra clave. Ahora que ya terminamos con el informe vamos a comenzar con algunos análisis. Para su información, se permite sólo unos combinación de métricas y dimensiones. Puede consultar la lista completa aquí.

Como he mencionado anteriormente, la idea era generar un informe que me ayudaría a comprender el rendimiento del sitio Web en términos de su facilidad de uso. Pero en la creación del informe lo que encontré fue bastante sorprendente.

Para cualquier comercializador de internet es un temible espectáculo ver gran cantidad de visitas en conjunción con ingresos insignificantes y estaba muy consciente del hecho de que es sólo cuestión de tiempo antes de mi cliente averiguó. Es claramente visible que los navegadores Opera y Opera Mini impulsan casi la misma cantidad de visitas a nuestro sitio Web, pero la diferencia de ingresos es bastante grande. Obviamente, esto se llama una investigación. La cuestión me acosado durante 10 minutos todo (me refiero a que 10 minutos suena muy menos pero confía en mí para esos 10 minutos me estaba volviendo loco).

De todos modos, mientras yo estaba arañando mi cabeza sobre él, algo más me llamó la atención.

Me encontré con que fui consiguiendo casi 5200% más (sí están viendo los números derecho!) en los ingresos de los navegadores Android comparado contra el mismo número de visitas de Opera Mini. Estaba nervioso y feliz al mismo tiempo y yo sabía que tenía que llegar al fondo de esto. Inmediatamente abrí mi sitio Web Opera mini, ópera y navegadores Android para comprender lo que era detener los usuarios de Opera Mini de comprar productos de mi sitio.

Bien en pocas palabras, los usuarios de Opera y Opera Mini fueron llevados a la versión de escritorio de la página Web. Debe tener en cuenta, Opera Mini es un navegador móvil y como cualquier SEO sabría consultor, aquí la recomendación obvia sería tomar el usuario a la versión móvil de la página Web. Pero ¿cómo convencer al cliente??? La respuesta se encuentra en el propio informe.

Ahí es cuando mostró los números android al cliente. Resulta que los usuarios Android fueron llevados a la versión móvil de la página Web. (Que es cuando damos nuestro momento Eureka ). Esto no es nada pero definitivamente mejorará hardcore evidencia que muestra que simplemente tomando los usuarios móviles a la versión móvil de la página Web de los ingresos. Los datos anteriores cuando se presentó como resultado en nuestras recomendaciones obteniendo implementadas sin dudas o inquietudes final del cliente.

Una vez más Google Analytics me hizo un héroe. Yo sería compartir más esos informes con todos ustedes SEOs increíbles y me encantaría oír de usted.


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.